Resources: Legal Alert

online

United States Supreme Court Changes Landscape of False Advertising Claims
May 15, 2014

A recent decision by the United States Supreme Court held that competitors are not the only ones that can sue for false advertising. The ruling is part of a legal battle dating back to 2002 between two companies that are not even direct competitors. On one side is Lexmark, a printer and related supplies manufacturer, and on the other, Static Control Components, a microchip manufacturer. The decision is both noteworthy and significant as it marks one of those rare occasions where the Court takes on a false advertising case and changes the law of the land.


This case concerns the traditionally high margin supplies business. Static Control's microchips are embedded in ink cartridges sold by Lexmark's competitors, enabling consumers to bypass Lexmark's single-use mechanism, which was designed to promote Lexmark's sales. Lexmark lost its bid to have Static Control's activity declared illegal in 2004, and the remaining dispute centered on Lexmark's public statements about Static Control's microchips. Specifically, Static Control claimed that Lexmark's warning letters and statements to consumers and remanufacturers concerning the legal legitimacy of using the microchips were false and misleading under Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act. Lexmark countered, arguing Static Control lacked the right to sue (in legal parlance, "standing") under 43(a).

The ensuing legal battle saw the district court's decision (finding in favor of Lexmark) reversed on appeal by the Sixth Circuit. The United States Supreme Court subsequently granted Lexmark's request to review whether or not Static Control had standing and ruled that it did.

Key Takeaways
There are some important, practical lessons here. Among the most significant is that even companies that are not direct competitors need to be careful about what they say about each other. This point may not have been clear, but it should be now. Sales and marketing personnel should be advised of this, and marketing materials should be vetted by legal counsel to further minimize the risks.

We Can Help
Please contact Maslon's Advertising & Marketing Group if you have any questions regarding the information provided and how it may apply to your specific situation.

RELATED PRACTICE AREAS

Related Attorneys

DISCLAIMER
Thank you for your interest in contacting us by email.

Please do not submit any confidential information to Maslon via email on this website. By communicating with us we are not establishing an attorney-client relationship, and information you submit will not be protected by the attorney-client privilege and cannot be treated as confidential. A client relationship will not be formed until we have entered into a formal agreement. You should also be aware that we may currently represent parties whose interests may be adverse to yours, and we reserve the right to continue to represent them notwithstanding any communication we receive from you.

If you would like to discuss possible representation, please call one of our attorneys directly or use our general line (p 612.672.8200). We can then fully discuss our intake procedures and, if appropriate, introduce you to an attorney suited to assist with your matter. Alternatively, you may send us an email containing a general inquiry subject to these terms.

If you accept the terms of this notice and would like to send an email, click on the "Accept" button below. Otherwise, please click "Decline."