Resources: News

online

Bill Pentelovitch Argues Case Against Voter Photo ID Language Before Minnesota Supreme Court
July 19, 2012
Bill Pentelovitch, a partner in Maslon's Litigation Group, appeared before the Minnesota Supreme Court on Tuesday July 17, 2012, to argue that the ballot question mandated by the legislature for the proposed Voter ID Amendment that is slated to appear on the November general election ballot violates the Minnesota Constitution. Bill, along with Rich Wilson, Wayne Moskowitz and Catherine Ahlin-Halverson are representing the League of Women Voters Minnesota, Common Cause, Jewish Community Action, and five individuals in the challenge to the ballot question.

Six of the seven Minnesota Supreme Court justices questioned Bill and opposing counsel for the Minnesota legislature on the details surrounding the amendment and the challenge, focusing on constitutional principles dating back to the Federalist Papers. When asked after the hearing, how he thought the justices would rule, Bill declined to speculate stating, "They were very well informed and they asked the questions I thought they would ask." He continued, saying, "It will set a very important precedent in Minnesota if we win, which is that you have to at least be as honest with voters when putting an [amendment on the ballot] as a car dealer has to be in selling them a car: you can't lie, and you can't mislead."

Read media coverage and blog commentary on the lawsuit filed, and listen to hearings before the court below:

Minneapolis Star Tribune: ACLU petitions state high court to stop voter ID amendment
St. Paul Pioneer Press: Top Minnesota court joins voter ID fray
The Uptake (video): MN Supreme Court Hears Case Against Voter Photo ID Language
DISCLAIMER
Thank you for your interest in contacting us by email.

Please do not submit any confidential information to Maslon via email on this website. By communicating with us we are not establishing an attorney-client relationship, and information you submit will not be protected by the attorney-client privilege and cannot be treated as confidential. A client relationship will not be formed until we have entered into a formal agreement. You should also be aware that we may currently represent parties whose interests may be adverse to yours, and we reserve the right to continue to represent them notwithstanding any communication we receive from you.

If you would like to discuss possible representation, please call one of our attorneys directly or use our general line (p 612.672.8200). We can then fully discuss our intake procedures and, if appropriate, introduce you to an attorney suited to assist with your matter. Alternatively, you may send us an email containing a general inquiry subject to these terms.

If you accept the terms of this notice and would like to send an email, click on the "Accept" button below. Otherwise, please click "Decline."